Hare Krishna! This page was last updated on December 10, 2003.
Go to the Ritvik
Page
Go to the “Calcutta
Page”
|
From my humble perspective, [it] has more to do with the shadows cast on [Adridharan's] own consciousness by his recent and on-going offences to his godbrothers, than any thought or deed emanating from us. HARI-SAURI DASA Commenting on fire |
We didn't
burn down illegal Calcutta Pandal By Hari-sauri dasa CHAKRA
(Mayapur, India) - It has come to my attention that some rather
disparaging remarks have been aimed at me by Sriman Adridharana dasa, the
Calcutta temple president, regarding the recent fire, which destroyed his
illegal wedding pandal set up on ISKCON property at 22 Gurusaday Rd. In an
article to VNN Adridharana has done his best to seed the minds of his
readers with the idea that Sriman Dayaram dasa, my fellow Co-Director at
Mayapur, and myself were somehow to blame for the fire. Although I have
never logged onto VNN and very rarely to Chakra, I feel some
clarifications are needed to set the readers of such vitriol to rest. First I should state quite categorically that neither
myself, Dayarama prabhu nor anyone connected with us, acting directly or
indirectly, had anything to do with the wedding pandal burning down. As
far as we can tell it was an accident, most likely caused, as stated by
the fire brigade in the Calcutta newspapers, by faulty wiring or some such
other cause. It might interest readers to note that during the
same two-week period in Calcutta there were four major fires each of which
required the attention of over 35 fire tenders from all over the city to
put them out. A couple of important buildings were reduced to burnt-out
hulks and the wedding pandal was also razed to the ground. Perhaps HG
Adridharana prabhu thinks that we were responsible for those fires too?
The point here being that major fires can and do occur, the pandal was one
of them, and we were not in any way responsible. From my humble perspective, that Adridharana prabhu
has chosen to cast serious aspersions on our character, make false and
serious allegations and in general cast us in a sinister light, has more
to do with the shadows cast on his own consciousness by his recent and
on-going offences to his godbrothers, than any thought or deed emanating
from us. After all, he has not one iota of evidence to connect myself or
any other person from ISKCON to the destruction of his pandal other than
the dark conjectures of his own negatively predicated mind. Rather than
see such events as the mercy of the Lord and try to learn something from
them, he instead perfers to project evil intent upon his godbrothers. I
can only observe that the path of Vaisnava aparadha is indeed a long and
slippery one, marked by a descent in good feeling and humility towards
one’s fellow devotees. Once one has taken the step of attacking the
Vaisnavas it seems it is difficult to pull the mind out of this declivity. The attempt by Adridharana prabhu to make myself and
Dayaram prabhu the target of his aspersions in no way makes us guilty.
Rather the reader should examine the motives of Adridharana prabhu in
attempting to utilitize this event to further damage the leadership in the
eyes of innocent ISKCON devotees and strengthen his ill-conceived court
case. As far as events are concerned after the pandal burnt
down, I readily and happily confirm that we are doing whatever is within
our power to prevent the illegal pandal from being rebuilt. I believe
Dayaram prabhu has already offered some comments and I shall also explain
from another perspective why this is desirable. When I first became Co-Director in Mayapur in April
this year, Mr. Chatterjee, a very nice older gentleman who happens to be
the personal secretary to Sriman Radhapada dasa, aka Sri Deolal Tulsian,
rather quickly approached me. Radhapada prabhu, who is very old nowadays,
is an extremely humble and generous devotee, connected with ISKCON since
1974. He happens to be one of the biggest donors to ISKCON anywhere in the
world. He is the gentleman who donated to Mayapur Sri Sri Radha Madhava,
Asta-sakhis, and Panca-tattva. He donated the goshalla land in Vrindavana,
many sets of Gaura Nitai deities to various countries in the CIS, and
large amounts of money for various ISKCON projects. His total contribution
may be in excess of a couple of million dollars. He is also the man who donated the money for the
purchase of the ISKCON property at 22 Gurusaday Road, Calcutta as well as
the money to finally purchase the land at 3C Albert Road, our original
Calcutta temple. As far as Gurusadaya Road goes, Radhapada prabhu
stated right from the very beginning that he was donating the money for
the land so that a temple could be built and Deities installed. To his
great dismay, within a short time Adridharana prabhu instead began to use
the property for commercial purposes rather the spiritual purpose he had
intended. From that time on their dealings became increasingly
acrimonious. After some years an agreement was made that Adridharana would
supply financial accounts to Radhapada prabhu but this was also never
done. Gradually the wedding pandal became a source of a huge amount of
income, much of it unaccounted for, while becoming increasingly degraded.
Of recent years the serving of alchol has been allowed, much to the
distress of Radhapada prabhu who cannot understand how the property he
bought for building an ISKCON temple on is now principally used for
illicit activity. Now, to return to my point, Mr. Chatterjee approached
me in all earnestness with a file about 2 inches thick. It contained years
of correspondence between Radhapada prabhu and various members of the GBC
regarding the rough and rude handling he has undergone over the years at
the hands of Adridharana prabhu. I won’t go into the details here but
suffice to say that somehow, although Radhapada prabhu has done so much
service for the Calcutta yatra, Adridharana prabhu has dealt with him in
such a way that all Radhapada prabhu wants to do is see that he is
removed. He is very upset with him and has received little respite from
the GBC in dealing with him due to Adridharana’s strong position as the
Calcutta temple president. So Mr. Chatterjee gave me the file so that as
the new Mayapur Co-Director, I would be well informed as to Radhapada’s
dealings with our Calcutta management. Then in July, the morning after Rathayatra, Mr.
Chatterjee again approached me. Quite happily he informed me that the
wedding pandal at Gurusaday road had burnt to the ground. It was complete
news to me, I had no idea of what had happened. We rang Calcutta and
through one devotee who had been at the site in the early morning, had it
confirmed that it was true. Mr. Chatterjee was pleased because he finally
saw, after many years, a possible end to Adridharana’s misuse of the
property. After some consultation the managers of Mayapur
concluded that this was an opportunity sent by Lord Jagannatha to stop the
nonsense going on at Gurusaday Road and restore it to its original
intended purpose. We therefore undertook to approach various authorities
in Calcutta to have the pandal permanently finished. In this we have the
full backing of the donor, Radhapada prabhu. We feel that the course we have undertaken is correct
and pleasing to Srila Prabhupada. There is no doubt that Adridharana
prabhu’s behavior towards Radhapada prabhu has been reprehensible over
the years in regard to this property, just as his actions in dragging the
GBC and our Society into court against Srila Prabhupada’s instructions
is also reprehensible. He has set himself against our Society and we have
no choice now but to deal with him in like fashion. Personally I have nothing against Adridharana prabhu,
and I greatly admire much of what he has done over the years. But he
appears to have slipped into an abyss of faultfinding against his
godbrothers and that is very regretable. I was originally quoted here on Chakra in reference
to the pandal burning down that that I think Lord Jagannath is trying to
tell him something but whether he will hear it or not remains to be seen.
From his recent text it appears that the Lord’s message is falling on
deaf ears. This is most unfortunate but perhaps understandable. After all,
when a person takes it upon himself to publicly attack his fellow
Vaisnavas with vehemence and venom, how will he get the humility necessary
to hear what the Lord is trying to tell him from both within and without? Your humble servant, Hari-sauri dasa © CHAKRA 29-Nov-2003 Go to the Ritvik Page |
|
© Copyright November, 2003 by oldchakra.com. All rights reserved.
For information
about this website or to report an
error, write to webmaster@oldchakra.com