Go to the Letters
Page
Other
articles about Raghunatha
Stocker
|
This is a difficult bridge we come to again and again, a test of our actual faith in the Supreme. |
Comments on
Raghunatha Stocker's letter By Dina Sharana dasa In reference to Raghunatha Stocker’s recent letter about his sad and tragic Gurukula experience, I’m reminded of how Srila
Bhaktisiddhanta Sarasvati would tell managers, “preach the truth,
don’t worry, money will come.” On that note, unfortunately in retrospect, we must
recognize in the light of our Gita, that what “service” we offer to
Srila Prabhupada, if it is not done properly, if corners are cut, if it is
actually “unclean” work in the sense that such “service”
passionately hangs onto achieving short term “fruits,” even so called
“spiritual fruits,” while conveniently denying hard, bitter truths
that need to be dealt with, i.e. ex-communicating a “big-leader,”
“big collector,” etc. that is in fact a great “disservice” to Lord
Chaitanya, Sad-Gosvami, and most importantly, our Founder-Acarya Srila
Prabhupada. Better the temple takes five more years to build,
better a few less books get distributed, better we slow down and do the
job right. Maybe Satadhyanya’s ex-communication, if that’s what’s
actually indicated, could interfere with some Court Case. Is God so
impotent He can’t somehow cover the gap? This is a difficult bridge we come to again and
again, a test of our actual faith in the Supreme. That faith is tested by
our ability to cut off a finger, arm, endeavor, desire, etc, “doing the
right thing,” “at the right time,” even in the face of seeming
backwards movement, understanding that faith in God, action based on
scripture, attachment to the Eternal rather than the moment, is the best
course of action, and what we are supposed to exemplify for the world to
follow. Any sentimental, materialistic “Old Buddy” club has to be
rooted out. Business. We love each other, we care, but the first attention
is to our Father’s business, and for that purpose, stiff actions must be
taken without hesitation. Look how Rama dismissed Laksmana. Look how Sita
was banished even in Rama’s court. Rama was not sentimental in some
bodily way. It was duty: devotion to God and scripture. This is a Ksatriya. Not that I’m perfect, yet reminding each other of
the benchmarks is appropriate and helps us all in our forward progress. Yours in service, © CHAKRA 26-Sep-1999 Go to the Letters
Page |
|
© Copyright December, 2003 by oldchakra.com. All rights reserved.
For information
about this website or to report an
error, write to webmaster@oldchakra.com